Recurrent large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in an Irish case series


      • We present a national cohort study of carriers of large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
      • As expected, LGRs were more commonly identified in BRCA1 (49 families) than BRCA2 (7 families).
      • A number of recurrent LGRs were identified in BRCA1: deletions of Exons 1–23; Exon 3; and Exons 19–20.
      • One LGR in BRCA2, deletion of Exons 19–20 was identified in five unrelated families.
      • There was regional variation in distribution of LGRs, with most recurrent LGRs detected in the West.
      Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer a highly increased risk of cancers, mainly of the breast and ovary. Most variants are point mutations or small insertions/deletions detectable by Sanger sequencing. Large genomic rearrangements, including deletions/duplications of multiple exons, are not routinely detectable by Sanger sequencing, but can be reliably identified by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), and account for 5–17% mutations in different populations. Comprehensive mutation testing using these two methods has been facilitated via our centre since 2005. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of and phenotype associated with large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in an Irish cohort. An observational cohort study was undertaken. Patients with large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1/BRCA2 were identified from a prospectively maintained database of MLPA test results. Phenotypic and genotypic data were retrieved by chart review. Large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 were identified in 49 families; and in BRCA2 in 7 families, representing ~11% of mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 in Ireland. The most common large genomic rearrangement in BRCA1 was deletion of exons 1–23 (11 families, 7 from Co. Galway). Other common mutations included deletions of exon 3 (8 families) and exons 1–2 (6 families). Deletion of exons 19–20 in BRCA2 represented the familial mutation in five families, all from East Ireland (Wexford/Wicklow/Dublin). It is evident that a significant proportion of highly penetrant pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 will be missed if testing is limited to PCR-based Sanger sequencing alone. Screening for large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the routine diagnostic workflow is critical to avoid false negative results.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Cancer Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Chen S.
        • Parmigiani G.
        Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 1329-1333
        • Iqbal J.
        • Ragone A.
        • Lubinski J.
        • et al.
        The incidence of pancreatic cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
        Br J Cancer. 2012; 107: 2005-2009
        • Liede A.
        • Karlan B.Y.
        • Narod S.A.
        Cancer risks for male carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a review of the literature.
        J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 735-742
        • Rebbeck T.R.
        • Mitra N.
        • Wan F.
        • et al.
        Association of type and location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
        JAMA. 2015; 313: 1347-1361
        • Antoniou A.
        • Pharoah P.D.P.
        • Narod S.
        • et al.
        Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 72: 1117-1130
        • Woodward A.M.
        • Davis T.A.
        • Silva A.G.
        • et al.
        Large genomic rearrangements of both BRCA2 and BRCA1 are a feature of the inherited breast/ovarian cancer phenotype in selected families.
        J Med Genet. 2005; 42: e31
        • James P.A.
        • Sawyer S.
        • Boyle S.
        • et al.
        Large genomic rearrangements in the familial breast and ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 are associated with an increased frequency of high risk features.
        Fam Cancer. 2015; 14: 287-295
        • Judkins T.
        • Rosenthal E.
        • Arnell C.
        • et al.
        Clinical significance of large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
        Cancer. 2012; 118: 5210-5216
        • Castéra L.
        • Krieger S.
        • Rousselin A.
        • et al.
        Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes.
        Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 22: 1305-1313
        • Kang H.P.
        • Maguire J.R.
        • Chu C.S.
        • et al.
        Design and validation of a next generation sequencing assay for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing.
        Peer J. 2016; 4 (2016(6)): e2162
        • Zhang J.
        • Fackenthal J.D.
        • Huo D.
        • et al.
        Searching for large genomic rearrangements of the BRCA1 gene in a Nigerian population.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 124: 573-577
        • Palma M.D.
        • Domchek S.M.
        • Stopfer J.
        • et al.
        The relative contribution of point mutations and genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in high-risk breast cancer families.
        Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 7006-7014
        • Gad S.
        • Caux-Moncoutier V.
        • Pages-Berhouet S.
        • et al.
        Significant contribution of large BRCA1 gene rearrangements in 120 French breast and ovarian cancer families.
        Oncogene. 2002; 21: 6841-6847
        • Seong M.W.
        • Cho S.I.
        • Kim K.H.
        • et al.
        A multi-institutional study of the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large genomic rearrangements in familial breast cancer patients.
        BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 645
        • Smith M.J.
        • Urquhart J.E.
        • Harkness E.F.
        • et al.
        The contribution of whole gene deletions and large rearrangements to the mutation spectrum in inherited tumor predisposing syndromes.
        Hum Mutat. 2016; 37: 250-256
        • Ticha I.
        • Kleibl Z.
        • Stribrna J.
        • et al.
        Screening for genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Czech high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients: high proportion of population specific alterations in BRCA1 gene.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 124: 337-347
        • Lupski J.R.
        • Stankiewicz P.
        Genomic disorders : the genomic basis of disease.
        • Casilli F.
        • Tournier I.
        • Sinilnikova O.M.
        • et al.
        The contribution of germline rearrangements to the spectrum of BRCA2 mutations.
        J Med Genet. 2006; 43: e49
        • O'Dushlaine C.T.
        • Morris D.
        • Moskvina V.
        • et al.
        Population structure and genome-wide patterns of variation in Ireland and Britain.
        Eur J Hum Genet. 2010; 18: 1248-1254
        • Evans D.G.
        • Eccles D.M.
        • Rahman N.
        • et al.
        A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO.
        J Med Genet. 2004; 41: 474-480
        • Evans D.G.
        • Lalloo F.
        • Wallace A.
        • et al.
        Update on the Manchester scoring system for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.
        J Med Genet. 2005; 42: e39
        • Evans D.G.R.
        • Lalloo F.
        • Cramer A.
        • et al.
        Addition of pathology and biomarker information significantly improves the performance of the Manchester scoring system for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.
        J Med Genet. 2009; 46: 811-817
        • MRC-Holland
        General MLPA protocol for the detection and quantification of nucleic acid sequences.
        • Weitzel J.N.
        • Lagos V.I.
        • Herzog J.S.
        • et al.
        Evidence for common ancestral origin of a recurring BRCA1 genomic rearrangement identified in high-risk Hispanic families.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16: 1615-1620
        • Weitzel J.N.
        • Clague J.
        • Martir-Negron A.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and type of BRCA mutations in hispanics undergoing genetic cancer risk assessment in the southwestern united states: a report from the clinical cancer genetics community research network.
        J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 210-216
        • Villarreal-Garza C.
        • Alvarez-Gomez R.M.
        • Perez-Plasencia C.
        • et al.
        Significant clinical impact of recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Mexico.
        Cancer. 2015; 121: 372-378
        • Ewald I.P.
        • Cossio S.L.
        • Palmero E.I.
        • et al.
        BRCA1 and BRCA2 rearrangements in Brazilian individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
        Genet Mol Biol. 2016; 39: 223-231
        • MRC-Holland
        Product Description SALSA® MLPA® probemix P002-D1 BRCA1.
        (Available at:) (Accessed 10 April, 2017)
        • MRC-Holland
        Product Description SALSA® MLPA® probemix P090-B1 BRCA2.
        (Available at:) (Accessed 10 April, 2017)
        • Lim Y.K.
        • Iau P.T.C.
        • Ali A.B.
        • et al.
        Identification of novel BRCA large genomic rearrangements in Singapore Asian breast and ovarian patients with cancer.
        Clin Genet. 2007; 71: 331-342
        • Hendrickson B.C.
        • Judkins T.
        • Ward B.D.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of five previously reported and recurrent BRCA1 genetic rearrangement mutations in 20,000 patients from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families.
        Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005; 43: 309-313
        • Mazoyer S.
        • Leary J.
        • Kirk J.
        • et al.
        The exon 13 duplication in the BRCA1 gene is a founder mutation present in geographicaly diverse populations.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 67: 207-212
        • Hogervorst F.B.
        • Nederlof P.M.
        • Gille J.J.
        • et al.
        Large genomic deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 gene identified by a novel quantitative method.
        Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 1449-1453
        • Hofmann W.
        • Gorgens H.
        • John A.
        • et al.
        Screening for large rearrangements of the BRCA1 gene in German breast or ovarian cancer families using semi-quantitative multiplex PCR method.
        Hum Mutat. 2003; 22: 103-104
        • Steel C.M.
        • Anderson E.
        • Campbell J.
        • et al.
        BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
        Br J Cancer. 2003; 88: 1256-1262
        • Yap K.P.
        • Ang P.
        • Lim I.H.
        • et al.
        Detection of a novel Alu-mediated BRCA1 exon 13 duplication in Chinese breast cancer patients and implications for genetic testing.
        Clin Genet. 2006; 70: 80-82
        • Al-Moundhri M.S.
        • Al-Ansari A.
        • Al-Mawali K.
        • et al.
        BRCA1 gene molecular alterations in Omani breast cancer patients.
        Gulf J Oncol. 2013; 1: 45-51
        • Casilli F.
        • Di Rocco Z.C.
        • Gad S.
        • et al.
        Rapid detection of novel BRCA1 rearrangements in high-risk breast-ovarian cancer families using multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments.
        Hum Mutat. 2002; 20: 218-226
        • Walsh T.
        • Casadei S.
        • Coats K.H.
        • et al.
        Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer.
        JAMA. 2006; 295: 1379-1388
        • Ellis D.
        • Patel Y.
        • Yau S.C.
        • et al.
        Low prevalence of BRCA1 exon rearrangements in familial and young sporadic breast cancer patients.
        Fam Cancer. 2006; 5: 323-326
        • Riahi A.
        • Chabouni-Bouhamed H.
        • Kharrat M.
        Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large genomic rearrangements in Tunisian high risk breast/ovarian cancer families: implications for genetic testing.
        Cancer Genet. 2017; 210: 22-27
        • de la Hoya M.
        • Gutierrez-Enriquez S.
        • Velasco E.
        • et al.
        Genomic rearrangements at the BRCA1 locus in Spanish families with breast/ovarian cancer.
        Clin Chem. 2006; 52: 1480-1485
        • Agata S.
        • Viel A.
        • Della Puppa L.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of BRCA1 genomic rearrangements in a large cohort of Italian breast and breast/ovarian cancer families without detectable BRCA1 and BRCA2 point mutations.
        Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006; 45: 791-797
        • Machado P.M.
        • Brandao R.D.
        • Cavaco B.M.
        • et al.
        Screening for a BRCA2 rearrangement in high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families: evidence for a founder effect and analysis of the associated phenotypes.
        J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 2027-2034
        • Tournier I.
        • Paillerets B.B.
        • Sobol H.
        • et al.
        Significant contribution of germline BRCA2 rearrangements in male breast cancer families.
        Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 8143-8147
        • Petrucelli N.
        • Daly M.B.
        • Feldman G.L.
        Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
        Genet Med. 2010; 12: 245-259
        • Dick M.G.
        • Versmold B.
        • Engel C.
        • et al.
        Association of death receptor 4 variant (683A > C) with ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
        Int J Cancer. 2012; 130: 1314-1318
        • Cox D.G.
        • Simard J.
        • Sinnett D.
        • et al.
        Common variants of the BRCA1 wild-type allele modify the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
        Hum Mol Genet. 2011; 20: 4732-4747
        • McVeigh T.P.
        • Bradley L.
        Pedigree drawing in the department of clinical genetics: an audit of adherence to international recommendations (abstract).
        Ulster Med J. 2015; 84: 200-214