Advertisement
Rapid Communication| Volume 266, P86-89, August 2022

Download started.

Ok

Fibroblast testing can inform medical management in individuals with mosaic variants detected on hereditary cancer panels

      Highlights

      • Mosaic variants confirmed on fibroblast testing correlate well with clinical histories that are consistent with the germline condition.
      • NF1 mosaic pathogenic variants are often present likely as a result of clonal hematopoiesis (CH).
      • Presence of a mosaic variant in an individual with ovarian cancer, particularly if the variant is in a gene not linked to ovarian cancer risk, seems to signal CH as opposed to constitutional mosaicism.

      Abstract

      Mosaic variants are regularly detected on hereditary cancer genetic tests. While some of these variants may be constitutional, the majority are likely limited to blood lineages. In the present study, we correlate clinical histories from individuals with mosaic findings identified on hereditary cancer testing and the outcomes of follow-up fibroblast (FB) testing. We observed 620 mosaic variants, including 339 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) occurring most often in TP53, CHEK2, ATM, and NF1. About half of individuals with NF1 mosaic PVs did not report any clinical features of NF1 and were older at testing (p<0.0001) compared to those with an NF1-related phenotype. Among 42 mosaic PVs evaluated by FB testing, 17 (40.5%) were confirmed in FB and were mostly identified in individuals with phenotypes consistent with the gene disease spectrum. Our data show that FB testing is helpful for identifying those with likely constitutional mosaicism benefitting from increased screening and follow-up vs. those with blood-limited variants potentially not requiring intense surveillance but warranting further hematologic work-up.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Cancer Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Genovese G
        • et al.
        Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 2477-2487https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1409405
        • Jaiswal S
        • et al.
        Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 2488-2498https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1408617
        • Xie M
        • et al.
        Age-related mutations associated with clonal hematopoietic expansion and malignancies.
        Nat Med. 2014; 20: 1472-1478https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3733
        • Gillis NK
        • et al.
        Clonal haemopoiesis and therapy-related myeloid malignancies in elderly patients: a proof-of-concept, case-control study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18: 112-121https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30627-1
        • García-Romero MT
        • et al.
        Mosaic neurofibromatosis type 1: a systematic review.
        Pediatr Dermatol. 2016; 33 (Jan-Feb): 9-17https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12673
        • Coffee B
        • et al.
        Detection of somatic variants in peripheral blood lymphocytes using a next generation sequencing multigene pan cancer panel.
        Cancer Genet. 2017; 211: 5-8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2017.01.002
        • Slavin TP
        • et al.
        Prevalence and characteristics of likely-somatic variants in cancer susceptibility genes among individuals who had hereditary pan-cancer panel testing.
        Cancer Genet. 2019; 235-6: 31-38https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.04.005
        • Mester JL
        • et al.
        Apparently heterozygous TP53 pathogenic variants may be blood limited in patients undergoing hereditary cancer panel testing.
        J Mol Diagn. 2020; 22: 396-404https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.12.003
        • Hinds DA
        • et al.
        Germ line variants predispose to both JAK2 V617F clonal hematopoiesis and myeloproliferative neoplasms.
        Blood. 2016; 128: 1121-1128https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-06-652941
        • Richards S
        • et al.
        ACMG laboratory quality assurance committee: standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology.
        Genet Med. 2015; 17: 405-424https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30
        • Ejerskov C
        • et al.
        Clinical features and disease severity in patients with mosaic neurofibromatosis type 1: a single-center study and literature review.
        Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021; 16: 180https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01796-3
        • Philpott C
        • et al.
        The NF1 somatic mutational landscape in sporadic human cancers.
        Hum Genomics. 2017; 11: 13https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-017-0109-3
        • Batalini F
        • et al.
        Li-Fraumeni syndrome: not a straightforward diagnosis anymore-the interpretation of pathogenic variants of low allele frequency and the differences between germline PVs, mosaicism, and clonal hematopoiesis.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2019; 21: 107https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1193-1
        • Marnell CS
        • et al.
        Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP): linking somatic mutations, hematopoiesis, chronic inflammation and cardiovascular disease.
        J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2021; 161: 98-105https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2021.07.004
        • Weber-Lassalle K
        • et al.
        Clonal hematopoiesis-associated gene mutations in a clinical cohort of 448 patients with ovarian cancer.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021; (Dec 28; online ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab231